SUITABILITY

AS IT IS DETERMINED IN CONNECTICUT FIREARMS LAW IS CHALLENGED IN THIS APPEAL

ON

CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS

THIS APPEAL IS THE DIRECT RESULT OF THE KNOWLEDGE, EXTENSIVE RESEARCH, EXPERIENCE AND DEDICATION OF:

ATTORNEY RACHEL M. BAIRD

These PDF files were created from an appeal brief filed July 29, 2010 in the Connecticut Appellate Court in Hartford.

The appeal was necessary because a judge in the Superior Court dismissed a request for Declaratory Judgment on the topics of arresting people for Openly Carrying and Confiscation/revocation of Valid Permits to Carry by local law enforcement authorities. 

Since the dismissal of the Declaratory Request, the McDonald v. Chicago Case has been rendered by the U.S. Supreme Court which now allows the appellate court to hear and decide constitutional issues regarding the validity and use of "SUITABILITY" as a factor in Connecticut Permit to Carry issues.

I would like to personally thank Attorney Rachel M. Baird for her dedication to the protection of my constitutional as well as the rights of others who have experienced the effects of uninformed and sometimes over zealous members of law enforcement

Appeal PDF Part 01   Main Title page with Table of Contents

Appeal PDF Part 02    Table of Authorities

Appeal PDF Part 03    Statement of Facts

Appeal PDF Part 04    Argument part a

Appeal PDF Part 05    Argument part b

Appeal PDF Part 08    Appendix Title Page Appendix part b

Appeal PDF Part 09    Appendix part c

Appeal PDF Part 10    Appendix part d

Appeal PDF Part 11    Appendix part e

Appeal PDF Part 12    Appendix part f

Appeal PDF Part 13    Appendix part g

Appeal PDF Part 14    Appendix part h

Appeal PDF Part 15    Appendix part i

Appeal PDF Part 16    Appendix part j